An opportunity for a real crisis Seventy percent of 10-year-olds in low- and middle-income countries still cannot read a simple story fluently. Yet a new The World Bank field experiment in Benin City, Nigeria shows what’s possible when generative-AI steps in as a virtual tutor. Over just six weeks
AI-coaching is everywhere. Professors, HR leaders, and L&D experts all hail it as the future of executive development, and our recent research data agrees—it's one of the fastest-growing AI use cases expected to almost double over the next two years. Sounds exciting, right? Here’s
Despite the surge of AI initiatives across corporate functions, our recent research between 100facets.ai and University of St.Gallen (HSG) – Executive School reveals that 50% of organizations remain at the earliest stages—“inexperienced” or merely “exploring.” Even more startling, only 4% have achieved full “strategic integration.” This gap underscores
By now, everyone from the boardroom to frontline teams is talking about AI. Yet new research from 100facets.ai , in partnership with the University of St.Gallen (HSG) – Executive School , shows that while AI dominates executive agendas, most organizations are far from being genuinely prepared. We surveyed 155 senior leaders
In a keynote I was giving to a group of Senior Executives in one of the world's biggest producers of construction materials, I used this simple 2x2 matrix to clarify a major issue I see among many leaders and organizations when facing with the big question of these
In the rush to adopt artificial intelligence (AI), many organizations get caught up in the excitement of “shiny objects.” These quick wins or experimental pilots—let’s call them “AI toys”—often generate buzz but deliver limited value. In contrast, “AI tools” are purposeful solutions with a clear path to
One of the findings of our latest research between 100facets.ai and University of St.Gallen (HSG) – Executive School , covering 155 senior leaders, was a direct correlation between an organization’s readiness for AI and the sophistication of the use cases they deploy. Among low-readiness companies, nearly 40% report no
Our research by 100facets.ai and University of St.Gallen (HSG) – Executive School with 155 senior HR and L&D leaders reveals a near split in AI adoption approaches: 48% choose a passive “evolution” strategy—letting AI emerge organically—while the remaining half splits into “add-on” (33%) and “swap”
Across all segments—size, readiness level, and leadership role—respondents in the joint study between 100facets.ai and University of St. Gallen (HSG) – Executive School pinpointed two prime benefits of AI in HR and L&D: “faster, deeper discovery of strengths and weaknesses” and “reduced administrative workload.” While cost-cutting
Findings of our research between 100facets.ai and University of St.Gallen (HSG) – Executive School reveals that 54% of the impetus for AI adoption in HR and L&D stems from “pull” factors—efficiency gains (26%) and effectiveness improvements (28%)—rather than push factors like top-management mandates or fear